glp1gradedGLP-1 provider ratings

How many GLP-1 sellers publish a price

Every GLP-1 seller this research could find had its own pages opened and read — 588 companies, 1886 pages. Fewer than one in seven published a price a reader can put beside another seller’s. This page is the count, and the rule applied at each step that narrows it.

Reviewed by Ellis Brandt. Sources checked September 2026.

What was read, and how

588 sellers, 1886 pages opened between them, of which 1737 loaded and 149 did not. Those pages carried 3317 dollar figures, 299 of them the same figure printed twice, leaving 3018 distinct prices. All of it was read on a single day, September 2026.

A price counts as published only if you can see it. A number hidden in a page’s code that never appears on screen counts as absent; a price behind a tab or an accordion you can open counts as published, because you can reach it. What each price was for was then settled by reading the words around it, not by pattern-matching.

Three companies from the original list are left out of every number here: one isn’t a seller, and two are domains that no longer belong to the companies they name. A domain that changed hands cannot be reported as that company’s page.

These pages were read once, on one day. Nothing here is a trend or a price movement: there is no earlier reading to compare against.

Where the numbers came from

Each of the 588 sellers falls into exactly one of six outcomes. The six sum to 588; nothing was dropped for being inconvenient, including the sellers whose sites would not render for this reading at all.

What 588 GLP-1 sellers published

Share of the 588 sellers whose pages were opened. Each seller is counted once, in one outcome.

  1. No page rendered

    13 of 588

    Counted as read and reported, not dropped. A site that would not render is a gap in this reading, not a finding about the company.

  2. No visible figure anywhere

    50 of 588

  3. Figures in markup only

    29 of 588

    Presence is not publication: text a reader never sees is counted as absent. A collapsed panel a control opens would have rendered on open and been counted as published.

  4. Figures, but none tied to a GLP-1

    88 of 588

    A figure with nothing near it naming a drug cannot be shown to price that drug. This counts what could be tied, not what the company sells.

  5. No standing monthly rate

    210 of 588

    A one-off charge, a prepay total, an introductory price or a floor is a number, but not a rate that recurs.

  6. A standing monthly rate

    198 of 588

Read from each seller’s own public pages, September 2026. How a figure is counted is on how we grade.

180 of the 588 published nothing this reading could tie to a GLP-1 — either no visible figure at all, or figures with nothing near them naming one of these drugs. That is a statement about what could be shown, not a claim those companies sell nothing: a price with no drug named beside it cannot be proved to be that drug’s price, and this site would rather report the gap than guess across it.

From every seller read to the ones with a comparable price

The same 588 sellers, narrowed one rule at a time. Each step below is a subset of the one above it.

From 588 sellers read to 61 whose figure states what it buys

Sellers, out of the 588 whose pages were opened. Each rung is a subset of the rung above it.

  1. Pages opened and read

    588

  2. At least one page rendered

    575 of 588

  3. Published a figure tied to a GLP-1

    408 of 588

  4. Published a standing monthly rate

    198 of 588

    A one-off charge, a prepay total, an introductory price or an advertised floor is a number, but it is not a rate that recurs.

  5. That rate is comparable with another seller's

    117 of 588

    It names semaglutide or tirzepatide, it was read on a page scoped to that drug, and the amount is unambiguous. These are the sellers with a page on this site.

  6. The figure states what dose it buys

    61 of 588

    The only sellers this site prints a price for. The other 56 have a page that states what was read and why no figure is shown.

Every rung from the same reading, September 2026. The last two are the sellers the boards and the prices on this site are built from.

61 of 588 is 10 per cent. That is the honest size of the comparable GLP-1 market as its own websites describe it — not the size of the market, which is far larger, but the share of it that published a number a buyer can weigh against another number.

The three narrowings, and the rule each applies

Three rules do almost all of the narrowing, and each one is a decision about what can be shown rather than a judgment of a company.

A figure has to be tied to a drug. 408 sellers cleared this and 180 did not. The test is whether the drug is named on the page the figure was read on, or in the text immediately around it. A price on a page that never says what it is for is a price about which nothing can be said.

A rate has to recur. 210 of the 408 publish figures tied to a GLP-1 without any of them being a standing monthly rate. A prepay total for three months and a monthly rate are different quantities, and putting them in one column would be the comparison this site exists to refuse.

The rate has to name a molecule, on that molecule’s own page. 81 sellers publish a standing monthly rate this site still cannot compare, because the figure names a GLP-1 without saying which, or names a brand-name product, or was read on a general page rather than a page scoped to the drug. What drug a GLP-1 price is for counts that in full, across every published figure rather than one per seller.

The reasons overlap: one figure can fail two of these tests at once. That is why each rule is stated with its own two counts rather than drawn as a chart, which would add up to more than the 588 sellers it describes while looking like a neat split.

What this count is not

The three sets on this page, and what each one is
  1. Sellers whose pages were opened

    588 of 588 — What could be found and opened, not the whole market.

  2. Sellers with a page on this site

    117 of 588 — Every seller publishing a comparable standing monthly rate has a page here, priced or not.

  3. Sellers this site prints a price for

    61 of 588 — Only a figure that states what dose it buys is printed. The rule does not bend.

From the same reading, September 2026.

This is not a market size. It counts companies whose sites could be found and opened, and a seller that advertises nowhere a reader can reach was never in the count. It is not a ranking either: no company is named on this page, and no letter grade, score or order of medical quality is published on this site.

It is also not a price comparison. The analysis above counts published prices without comparing their amounts — 2608 of the 3018 figures read are not a comparable monthly rate, and a great many were read on pages that never say which drug they price. Where prices are printed on this site they come from the 61 sellers whose figure states what it buys, each one shown with the seller’s own words for what the money covers.

The roster page for every one of the 117 sellers with a comparable rate is under every seller we have read, including the 56 that carry no price and say why. What is counted, and what each measurement is worth, is on how we grade.

The other findings

Each one says how many sellers it counted, and the counts differ on purpose: a question can only be asked of the sellers who published enough to answer it.

Where the comparable sellers are compared

One board per buying decision, built from the 117 sellers above whose rate is comparable.

Every board above was read September 2026 and carries its own dated, counted title.

About our comparisons. Our scores measure published information, not medical quality. We do not assign an overall provider rating or rank providers by treatment outcomes.